Select how you’d like to proceed with your insurance needs.
Talk to a real insurance expert on your time.
15-minutes consultation with licensed advisors
Perfect if you’re unsure about coverage needs
Get personalised recommendations
Already have coverage? Let’s simplify your service
Keep your current carriers & policies
Simple digital authorisation process
Seamless transition to better service

Most service businesses get sued for advice they give. Agencies get sued for that too, plus something else.
You make things and put them in front of the public on someone else's behalf. A logo. A headline. A post that goes out at 4pm on a Friday from a client's account. Every one of those is a publication, and publication carries its own kind of risk.
That is why marketing agency insurance sits in a different place from ordinary professional cover. The question is not only whether your advice was sound. It is who owned the work, and what happened after it went live.
Most Australian agencies assess professional indemnity insurance as the base cover, because it commonly responds to claims about your work and advice, and in agency wordings often extends to intellectual property infringement and defamation. Cyber sits alongside it, since you hold client data and platform credentials. Public liability covers injury or damage at your office, a shoot or a client event. Management liability becomes relevant as the team grows, and workers compensation is compulsory once you employ staff.
The word that matters in that list is often. Agency exposures like IP infringement, defamation and media buying errors are not automatically inside every professional indemnity wording. Some policies address them, some exclude them, and some sit them behind a sublimit.
upcover arranges insurance for marketing and advertising agencies across Australia as a Corporate Authorised Representative of an AFSL holder.
Marketing agency insurance is not a single product. It is the bundle an agency assembles to cover the way agencies actually fail: professional indemnity insurance for the work and advice, cyber for the data and account access, public liability for premises and production, and management liability as the team grows.
What makes the agency version different from generic business cover is the extras that need to be inside the professional indemnity wording. Intellectual property infringement. Defamation. Misleading and deceptive conduct. Those three are where agency claims cluster, and none of them is automatic.
So when someone says they have professional indemnity, the useful question is not whether they have it. It is which of those three the wording actually addresses.
The honest answer is that most agency claims come from three places. Something you made looked too much like something else. Something you published caused harm. Or something you promised did not happen.
Two rows deserve attention before the rest. The performance promise is the one agencies create for themselves in a pitch deck. And the generated asset is the newest, because nobody can yet audit where a model's output came from.
Working out where you sit? Talk to upcover about agency cover with your service list to hand.
"Marketing agency" is the umbrella, and most Australian agencies sit under it while doing several of the things below. The reason to separate them is not that they are different products. It is that each service adds a different exposure, and your policy schedule has to name the ones you actually sell.
The five sections that follow build on each other. Read the ones that describe your work, then check the services description on your schedule against them.
Creative and brand work carries the heaviest intellectual property exposure of anything an agency does. Almost every deliverable involves licensed assets, or an original mark that has to sit clear of existing ones.
The exposure concentrates in three places: fonts, stock imagery, and brand marks that land too close to something already registered. A logo dispute reaches your client first, and your client then looks to you.
What to check. That the professional indemnity wording includes an intellectual property extension, and which rights that extension covers. Copyright is commonly included. Trademarks and patents are not always, which matters because a logo dispute is usually a trademark question.
If you also buy media for those campaigns, the next section applies to you as well.
Advertising and media buying shifts the exposure from creative risk to financial error. Client budget moves through your hands, so a placement in the wrong market, a mistargeted audience or a tracking error converts directly into a measurable client loss.
That is the cleanest kind of professional indemnity claim. The loss is quantifiable and the error is documented in a media plan.
What to check. That media buying appears in the insured services definition, particularly if you added the service after the policy started. Also whether misleading and deceptive conduct allegations are addressed, since campaign copy is where Australian Consumer Law bites hardest.
Where those campaigns involve statements about people or organisations, publication risk arrives too, which the next section covers.
Public relations carries the sharpest defamation exposure of any agency service. The output is statements about people and organisations, issued specifically to be repeated.
Add crisis and issues work to it and the same team is drafting statements under time pressure about a live dispute. That is the highest-risk writing in the industry, and Australian defamation law is unforgiving about it for reasons covered further down.
What to check. Whether defamation is inside the wording at all. Agency and media professional indemnity policies commonly address it. General professional indemnity policies often do not, and that single gap is the most common problem in PR placements.
Social and content work turns publication into a continuous activity rather than a milestone. You post on someone else's behalf, often outside business hours, sometimes without a second reader.
You may also be moderating comments on a client's page. That brings the publisher's question into play, which the defamation section below covers in detail, because Australian courts have already dealt with this exact scenario.
What to check. That social media management is declared, and that the wording covers content published on a client's behalf rather than only material you produced for a client to approve.
Production adds physical exposure to everything above. Shoots involve locations, equipment, crew and members of the public, which is public liability territory rather than professional indemnity. Client events sit in the same place.
Full-service agencies carry all five exposures at once. That makes the service description on your policy schedule the most important line in the document. If it describes you as a "marketing consultancy" while you buy media, manage social accounts and run shoots, the description is doing you no favours.
The binding point. Every section above ends at the same place: the schedule. Agency claims are rarely denied because the risk was uninsurable. They are denied because the service that caused the claim was not described in the policy.
Because IP infringement risk sits in almost every deliverable you ship, and most of it is invisible until someone sends a letter.
An agency does not hold much physical property. What it holds is other people's creative work, licensed under terms that were written by lawyers and read by nobody. That is where the claims come from.
Fonts. A font licence covers specific uses. Desktop use is not the same as web embedding, which is not the same as an app, which is not the same as a client's use after you hand over the files. Font licensing is one of the most common quiet breaches in the industry.
Stock imagery. Most stock licences cap the number of impressions, restrict use in merchandise or out-of-home, and exclude use in a logo or trademark. Buying the image is not the same as buying the right to use it the way the campaign eventually used it.
Brand identity that lands too close. A logo or name that sits near an existing trademark can generate a claim against your client, who then looks to you. Similarity is judged on the mark and the class of goods, not on whether you had seen the original.
Where a deliverable includes output from a generative tool, two questions arrive together.
Can the output infringe? Possibly, and you may not be able to tell. A model can reproduce protected elements without anyone intending it, and provenance is usually unverifiable.
Who owns it? Australian copyright law has generally been applied on the basis that protection requires a human author. How that applies to material produced with generative tools has not been fully settled, and no Australian decision has resolved it directly. Commercially the consequence is clearer than the law: if your contract promises the client full ownership of everything you deliver, check whether generated components can satisfy that promise.
Whether your policy still responds to a generated asset is a separate question, covered in the AI section below.
Clearance records are the difference between a defensible position and an expensive one.
For the difference between an IP extension and a standalone policy, see IP insurance vs professional indemnity insurance.
There is no dedicated "AI insurance" product for agencies in Australia. The real question is narrower and more useful: does your existing wording still respond when a deliverable was made with help from a generative tool?
That answer is changing, which is why it belongs in a renewal conversation rather than a footnote.
A professional indemnity policy generally covers claims arising out of work within the profession named on your schedule. It does not usually dictate which software produces that work. On that reading, an error in a deliverable made with a generative tool should be treated like an error made by a person on your team.
Australian professional indemnity commentary has taken that view broadly. Generative tools are tools, and the claim is still about your professional work.
Insurers have started writing AI into policies explicitly, and the direction is mostly restrictive.
Internationally, standard liability endorsements introduced for use from January 2026 exclude bodily injury, property damage, and personal and advertising injury arising out of generative artificial intelligence. That last category matters more to agencies than any other business type, because it is traditionally where defamation, privacy invasion and misappropriation of advertising ideas sit.
Some insurers have gone further with broad AI exclusions in professional and management liability wordings, reaching not only the output but AI governance, failure to detect AI-generated material supplied by others, and regulatory investigations about AI use. Others have moved the opposite way and offer affirmative AI extensions.
Two caveats matter for an Australian agency. Those standard endorsements are overseas liability forms, so they signal where the global market is heading rather than stating the position under an Australian policy. And appetite varies widely between insurers writing in Australia right now.
What is Australian and settled is the surrounding law. Consumer law still applies to a claim made in a generated ad. Defamation still applies to a generated statement. Copyright questions still run under the Copyright Act. The tool does not change which rules apply, only how hard it is to prove you checked.
The narrowing often does not arrive as a heading called "AI exclusion." It shows up in a revised base wording, a changed definition, a new application question, or a carve-back inside an extension you already had.
So the practical step at renewal is not to search the policy for the word "AI." It is to ask the insurer directly: does this wording restrict claims arising from work produced with generative tools, and does the intellectual property extension still respond to a generated asset?
Underwriters increasingly ask about AI use, and a clear answer helps.
For the wider Australian picture, including real incidents and how existing policies have responded, see AI insurance in Australia.
Sometimes, and it depends on the wording. Australian agency and media professional indemnity policies commonly address defamation alongside copyright infringement and breach of confidence. Many general professional indemnity wordings do not.
That distinction matters more for agencies than for most businesses, because of how Australian defamation law works.
Defamation in Australia is a strict liability tort. A plaintiff must show the material was published, that it identifies them, that it is defamatory, and since reforms commencing 1 July 2021, that it caused or is likely to cause serious harm to their reputation. For a company suing, that harm must be serious financial loss.
Once those elements are made out, the burden shifts to the defendant to establish a defence. Not knowing the statement was false is not itself a defence.
Damages for non-economic loss are capped, and the cap is indexed annually and differs between jurisdictions. Proven economic loss is not capped, which is the part that matters most in a commercial dispute. Check the current figure for the relevant state or territory rather than working from a number you read somewhere.
One jurisdictional note. Western Australia and the Northern Territory have not adopted the serious harm threshold, so the test differs depending on where a claim is brought.
In Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Voller [2021] HCA 27, the High Court held that media companies running public Facebook pages were publishers of defamatory comments left by third parties on those pages. The reasoning was that by creating a public page and posting content inviting engagement, they had facilitated the comments.
Read that with an agency hat on. If you set up a client's public page, schedule the content that invites engagement, and moderate the comments, you are performing the activity the High Court was describing.
Voller is where this risk came from, not where it ends. Later reforms, sometimes called the Stage 2 amendments, introduced defences and exemptions for digital intermediaries in the jurisdictions that adopted them. Adoption has been uneven and staggered, so whether those protections apply to you depends on where a claim is brought and how your arrangement is structured. That is a question for a lawyer, not an insurance guide.
What it means practically: if you manage client social accounts, tell your insurer. Real-time publication on someone else's behalf is a different risk from designing a brochure, and it should be declared rather than assumed.
It may, and the answer usually turns on whether the allegation is a professional error or a disappointing outcome.
Australian Consumer Law prohibits misleading or deceptive conduct in trade or commerce, and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission enforces it. A campaign claim that overstates what a product does can expose the advertiser, and the agency that wrote it.
The awkward question is who carries it when the client approves the copy. Approval matters, but how responsibility is allocated depends on the facts, each party's conduct and what the contract says. Neither side can assume approval settles it.
Australia runs a self-regulatory system for advertising content that operates in parallel with consumer law, and it catches agencies more often than legislation does.
The Australian Association of National Advertisers publishes codes covering advertising ethics, food and beverages, and advertising to children. Complaints about advertising content go to Ad Standards, whose Community Panel decides whether an ad breaches a code and can call for it to be modified or removed.
A code determination is not a court judgment and does not create legal liability by itself. What it creates is a commercial problem: a campaign pulled mid-flight, a client wearing the media spend, and an awkward conversation about who signed off.
Sector rules sit on top again. Therapeutic goods advertising has its own code. Alcohol advertising is covered by an industry scheme. Financial services, health services and gambling all carry their own restrictions. If your client list includes any of those, the review process matters as much as the insurance.
These are the cleanest agency claims to understand. Budget spent against the wrong audience, a placement that ran in the wrong market, a tracking error that misreported performance and led a client to keep spending. That is a professional error causing financial loss, which is what professional indemnity was built for.
Here the wordings diverge, and the contract usually decides it.
A campaign that failed to deliver leads is not by itself a professional error. Marketing is not a guarantee. But if your proposal promises a defined result, that promise becomes a contractual obligation. Professional indemnity generally responds to legal liability rather than promises you volunteered, so a performance guarantee can sit outside cover entirely.
The practical lesson is contractual rather than insurance-related. Read what your proposals promise before you read what your policy covers.
Because agencies hold two things attackers want: client customer data, and the keys to client advertising accounts.
Customer lists uploaded for audience matching. Campaign performance data. Email databases. Creative assets under embargo. And credentials or delegated access to client ad platforms, content management systems and social accounts.
That last one is the exposure agencies underrate. Access to a client's advertising account is access to a client's money. A compromised agency login can spend a client's budget or redirect it.
Multi-factor authentication on every ad platform and social account, not just email. These are the accounts with spending authority attached.
A clear position on client-supplied data. When a client sends you a customer list for audience matching, you have taken on their data. Agree in writing how long you hold it, where it sits, and when it is deleted.
A record of the tracking you deploy. Pixels, tags and third-party scripts you place on a client's site collect data on their behalf and yours. If one of them causes a privacy problem, someone will ask who chose it.
The Privacy Act includes a small business exemption, and it is narrower than a simple turnover rule. Businesses with annual turnover above $3 million are generally covered. Below that, several exceptions still bring a business inside the Act, including where it trades in personal information. Whether the exemption applies to your agency is worth confirming rather than assuming.
Two further points apply regardless of turnover. Since 10 June 2025, individuals have been able to bring proceedings directly under a statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy. And from 10 December 2026, entities covered by the Australian Privacy Principles must disclose in their privacy policy where personal information is used in certain automated decisions that significantly affect a person.
Cyber insurance may cover incident response, forensic work, data restoration, business interruption, notification costs and third-party privacy claims, subject to the wording. For cost detail, see how much does cyber insurance cost.
Two questions arrive together in practice. When does the exposure start, and whose work is inside the policy.
Not a revenue question. These are the moments where the answer changes.
It depends on the wording, and this is worth checking before the next brief rather than after a claim.
Agencies run on freelancers. Designers, copywriters, editors, developers, photographers, media buyers. Yet policy treatment varies. Some wordings extend to subcontractors working under your direction and control. Some cover the agency's liability for their work but not the freelancer personally. Some exclude subcontracted work outright.
Three questions worth asking.
Does the policy cover work performed by contractors on your behalf? If the answer is yes, check whether it covers your liability, their liability, or both.
Do your client contracts assume it? Many client agreements make you responsible for everyone who touches the work. If your policy excludes subcontractors and your contract does not, that gap is yours.
Do their clearances flow to you? A freelancer who uses an unlicensed font or an image beyond its licence creates an exposure that arrives at your door. Written warranties in your freelancer agreements are worth more than an assumption.
Exclusions differ between insurers, so treat each of these as a question for your policy rather than a rule.
Agency claims often start as an email rather than a lawsuit, and what you do in the first week matters.
Stop and preserve. Keep the deliverable, the brief, the approvals, the licence records and the correspondence. Do not quietly amend or delete the published material before taking advice, because the record is part of your defence.
Do not admit liability or offer to fix it. An offer to redo the work or refund the fee can look like an admission, and it can affect how the insurer handles the matter.
Notify your insurer or broker promptly. These wordings are commonly claims-made and notified, so telling the insurer early protects your position. Notify circumstances that could become a claim, not just formal demands.
Treat a concern notice as urgent. In defamation, a concerns notice is the formal step a person takes before suing. It sets out what was published and the harm alleged, and it starts a process with timeframes attached. Send it to your insurer and a lawyer the day it arrives.
Tell your client, and check the contract. Most agency contracts allocate responsibility for exactly this situation. Read the indemnity before the conversation, not after.
This is general information, not legal advice.
There is no useful average, and the reason is specific to agencies.
Two agencies with identical fee income can price very differently. One designs brand identities for local retailers. The other runs regulated-sector campaigns, buys media at scale, and manages client social accounts in real time. Same revenue, three extra layers of publication risk.
So rather than a figure, here is what moves it, heaviest first.
Tender and panel requirements usually set the floor, so check what your largest client agreements and any panel applications require before choosing a number.
Australian media and advertising firms commonly carry professional indemnity limits between $1 million and $10 million. Larger client contracts push it up. For how to think about the number, see what level of professional indemnity cover do I need and professional indemnity insurance cost.
Run your current schedule against these. They are ordered by how often they turn out to matter.
That last one is worth a pause. A campaign published to an offshore audience can attract a claim in that jurisdiction, and your policy territory may not follow it.
Having this ready turns a long conversation into a real quote.
Ready to compare? Explore agency insurance through upcover with those details to hand. Availability and terms depend on insurer acceptance.
Two things decide most marketing agency insurance placements. What you publish, and who else touched the work.
An agency that can describe its service mix precisely, name its regulated clients, and explain its clearance process gets a better result than one that answers approximately. It is the same information either way.
upcover is a digital-first insurance broker helping Australian small businesses get the right insurance without the paperwork or phone queues. upcover arranges cover for marketing and advertising agencies with access to 80+ insurance partners, including professional indemnity, cyber, public and products liability and management liability cover.
For the wider sector view, see professional and business services insurance.
upcover Pty Ltd ABN 17 628 197 437 is a Corporate Authorised Representative (CAR 1299211) of Experience Insurance Services Pty Ltd ABN 41 657 596 506, AFSL 539078.
Professional indemnity insurance is the base cover, and in agency wordings it often extends to intellectual property infringement and defamation. Cyber sits alongside it because you hold client data and platform access. Public liability covers your premises, shoots and events. Management liability becomes relevant as the team grows, and workers compensation is compulsory once you employ staff.
Often, through an intellectual property extension, but coverage varies on which rights are included. Some extensions cover copyright and exclude patent and trademark. Read the extension itself rather than relying on the phrase "intellectual property" in a summary.
It depends on the wording. Some policies extend to subcontractors working under your direction, some cover your liability for their work but not them personally, and some exclude subcontracted work. Check it against what your client contracts assume, because that is where the gap usually appears.
It may, where the wording includes defamation. Agency and media professional indemnity policies commonly address it, and general professional indemnity policies often do not. Declare social media management when you arrange cover, since real-time publication on a client's behalf is a distinct risk.
Possibly, and it depends on jurisdiction. In Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Voller the High Court held that operators of public Facebook pages were publishers of third-party comments. Later reforms introducing defences and exemptions for digital intermediaries were adopted, but adoption has been uneven. Take legal advice on your specific arrangements.
Australian copyright protects works with a human author, so output produced without meaningful human authorship may attract weak protection or none. That is a problem if your client contract promises full ownership of everything you deliver. Check what your contracts promise before relying on generated components.
A disappointing result is not by itself a professional error, and marketing is not a guarantee. But if your proposal promises a defined outcome, that becomes a contractual obligation. Professional indemnity generally responds to legal liability rather than promises you volunteered, so performance guarantees can sit outside cover.
Most hold client customer data, campaign databases and often credentials to client advertising accounts. That combination makes agencies a practical target, and access to a client's ad account is access to their budget. The Privacy Act generally applies above $3 million turnover, with exceptions that catch some smaller businesses.
Commonly yes, since it is a professional error causing a client financial loss, which is what the cover is built for. Check that media buying appears in the insured services definition, particularly if you added the service after the policy started.
Requirements vary by client and panel, and Australian media and advertising firms commonly carry limits between $1 million and $10 million. Government panels and large corporate clients tend to set the floor, so check the tender documents rather than choosing a round number.
This article is general information only. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs, and is not personal advice. It is not legal, intellectual property, defamation or consumer law advice. Defamation law, copyright and Australian Consumer Law obligations are set by legislation and case law that differ between states and territories and continue to develop, so take advice on your specific circumstances. Case and statutory references were current at the time of writing. Cover, limits, inclusions and exclusions vary between insurers, so read the relevant policy wording, schedule and any Product Disclosure Statement before deciding whether a product suits you. upcover Pty Ltd ABN 17 628 197 437 is a Corporate Authorised Representative (CAR 1299211) of Experience Insurance Services Pty Ltd ABN 41 657 596 506, AFSL 539078, and arranges insurance with selected insurers and underwriters rather than the whole market.
We are digitising commercial insurance and risk management for small, mid-market and technology businesses. We work with a global network of underwriters, challenging legacy brokers and delivering market leading coverage to our customers.