Select how you’d like to proceed with your insurance needs.
Talk to a real insurance expert on your time.
15-minutes consultation with licensed advisors
Perfect if you’re unsure about coverage needs
Get personalised recommendations
Already have coverage? Let’s simplify your service
Keep your current carriers & policies
Simple digital authorisation process
Seamless transition to better service

A hospital's procurement team asks for higher Tech PI and cyber limits before your software touches a clinical workflow. Or an AI feature you shipped last quarter now flags likely diagnoses instead of just scheduling appointments. That means your product's regulatory status needs reassessing. Healthtech startup insurance in Australia, and healthcare startup insurance more broadly, has to account for both moments, not just the usual technology risk.
Healthtech sits at the intersection of three separate questions. What does your product do and how is it supplied, which determines whether medical device regulation applies. Can it affect patient care, which determines whether you're carrying clinical or product liability risk on top of ordinary technology risk. And what health information you hold, which determines your privacy and cyber exposure. A generic tech startup insurance stack answers the third question reasonably well. It often misses the first two.
This isn't a SaaS guide with health data added on. upcover arranges insurance for healthtech businesses and for the broader tech startup and enterprise landscape it sits within.
Healthtech startup insurance in Australia comes down to four questions, not a fixed product list:
This is the first question to answer, before any medical software insurance discussion. The Therapeutic Goods Administration regulates software that meets the medical device definition under section 41BD of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989. This turns on the manufacturer's intended purpose and how the software is supplied. Instructions, website content, advertising and technical documentation can all be relevant, not simply what it's branded as.
TGA's own framework runs in three steps. First, does the software meet the medical device definition. This is generally because it's intended for diagnosis, monitoring, prediction, prognosis, treatment or alleviation of disease, injury or disability. Second, if it does, is it excluded from regulation entirely. Third, if it isn't excluded, is it exempt from some requirements while still being regulated.
TGA publishes specific exclusion categories, each subject to meeting the relevant criteria. These include:
Some clinical decision support software is also excluded or exempt depending on how it's used. For software with multiple functions, every function generally needs to meet the exclusion criteria for the whole product to qualify.
Excluded software carries no TGA regulatory requirement at all. Exempt software is still a regulated medical device but doesn't need to be included on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods before it's supplied. Getting this wrong in either direction has real consequences. Assuming you're excluded when you're not is a compliance problem. Assuming you need full ARTG inclusion when you're genuinely excluded means unnecessary cost and delay.
Potentially, and this is one of the more overlooked risks for a growing healthtech product. TGA's exclusion categories are function-specific, not product-specific. A scheduling and care-coordination platform that adds a feature interpreting symptoms, suggesting a diagnosis, or recommending treatment can require its TGA status to be reassessed. This can happen even though the rest of the product hasn't changed.
This matters for insurance as much as compliance. If your intended purpose changes, the insured-services description in your policy may no longer match what the business actually does. A feature shipped without reassessing either the regulatory position or the insurance wording can leave both out of date at the same time.
There's no fixed date when a healthtech startup must hold every available policy. Certain milestones tend to raise new questions about healthtech professional indemnity, cyber and clinical cover, both regulatory and insurance-related.
Most small businesses in Australia sit under the $3 million turnover exemption from the federal Privacy Act. Healthtech often doesn't get that benefit.
The clearest trigger, confirmed directly by the OAIC, is this: health service providers are bound by the Australian Privacy Principles regardless of turnover. A health service provider is one that provides services relating to physical, emotional, psychological or mental health. This can include digital and telehealth services, not only traditional practices.
A few other questions are worth checking alongside that:
A statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy has been in force since 10 June 2025. It extends beyond the ordinary Privacy Act regime and can apply to entities that aren't APP entities, subject to the statutory tests. This is one of the reasons healthtech cyber insurance is usually assessed alongside, not instead of, your privacy obligations. For a healthtech startup, the practical point is this: privacy obligations can apply well before you'd expect them to on revenue alone. That's because of what the business does, not how big it is.
Ordinary SaaS insurance decisions usually come down to two questions: does the technology work, and is the data protected. Healthtech adds a third: can this software affect patient care.
Which combination applies depends on what the product actually does, not on company size or funding stage. Some specialist healthtech cyber insurance and combined digital health products bundle several of these risks into one policy rather than requiring separate covers. It's worth asking a broker how a specific product is structured rather than assuming a fixed number of policies.
Not automatically, and there's no single answer that applies to every policy. Medical software insurance in this area is genuinely one of the harder categories to get right. Tech PI is generally built around financial loss arising from a technology or service failure. Whether it extends to bodily injury, and on what terms, depends entirely on the specific wording.
Where a technology failure could plausibly contribute to patient harm, rather than just financial loss, it's worth checking a few things specifically:
It's worth working through directly with a broker.
Hospital, health service and enterprise health contracts may set their own insurance requirements, evidence and limits before a deal proceeds. Healthtech professional indemnity and cyber cover are the two most commonly checked. What's asked for varies by health service and contract, but commonly includes:
Some health services also ask about security posture and data-handling practices alongside the insurance documentation itself.
Beyond the technology, clinical and privacy layers already covered, a few other policies become relevant depending on how the business operates.
Product or medical device liability. Worth assessing where the software is a regulated medical device, or where connected hardware such as a wearable or monitoring device is involved. Whether this needs a standalone policy or is addressed through specialist combined wording depends on how the product is placed.
Clinical or medical professional liability. Relevant where the business employs or engages health professionals delivering care, separate from the technology itself.
D&O and management liability. Tends to become relevant once a formal board or institutional investors are involved. Management liability may add EPL, statutory liability and crime cover alongside D&O.
Crime and social engineering. Cyber and crime cover can overlap, and funds-transfer or social-engineering losses may carry separate conditions or sublimits depending on the policy. Worth checking specifically if your business handles payments from patients, funders or health insurers.
Workers compensation. Required once you employ staff, though obligations and worker classifications vary by state and territory.
Public liability. Lower priority for a fully remote healthtech, more relevant with an office, clinic space, or in-person patient contact.
Sponsors are generally responsible for assessing medico-legal risk when running or sponsoring a clinical trial, including a decentralised or digital one. Trial approval can require evidence of appropriate indemnity and insurance as part of digital health insurance Australia arrangements more broadly. This may sit as a standalone trial-specific policy or as an addition to existing cover, depending on how it's placed and the institution involved. Ordinary Tech PI and cyber cover may not address participant-injury or sponsor liability on their own. This is worth raising specifically with a broker rather than assuming existing cover extends to trial participants.
The stalled hospital deal. A health service asks for Tech PI, cyber and product or clinical liability wording at specific limits before signing. Without the right cover already in place, the deal sits waiting while you arrange it under pressure.
The product that outgrew its insurance description. An AI feature adds diagnostic or interpretive functionality, but neither the regulatory assessment nor the insured-services description gets updated. If a claim follows, the gap between what the business now does and what the policy says it does becomes a real problem. That gap sits alongside the incident itself.
Most of what healthtech insurance Australia founders get wrong isn't the result of carelessness. Business insurance is genuinely easy to get wrong, and the gaps aren't obvious until a claim exposes them.
There's no fixed price for healthtech startup insurance, but based on a sample of upcover's own past healthtech policies, here's a general indication of where premiums have historically landed:
These figures exclude one significant outlier at the top end of the sample, since including it would have skewed the range for most readers. Paying monthly generally costs more over the year than paying annually upfront, which is common across business insurance more broadly, not specific to healthtech.
These numbers are based on upcover's own past business, not a quote. They reflect a sample of policies previously arranged for healthtech businesses and may not directly reflect your specific business. Your final premium will depend on your own business's classification, activities, data handled and other underwriting factors, and can sit above or below this range.
What actually drives where a specific business lands in that range:
For broader startup cost drivers, see the guide to startup business insurance costs.
Having the following ready makes it faster to get an accurate healthcare startup insurance quote:
upcover arranges insurance for healthtech and digital health businesses across Australia, with access to 80+ insurance partners. This covers most of what digital health insurance Australia founders search for, from administrative software through to more clinically involved products.
Where your business fits shapes where to start. If you're building administrative or scheduling software with limited clinical exposure, insurance for healthtech businesses is the natural starting point. If your product touches clinical workflows or patient data at scale, that same page is built around this distinction. If you're not yet sure whether TGA regulation applies, or your business involves a regulated medical device, a clinical trial, or practitioners delivering care through your platform, it's worth talking directly to a broker rather than starting with a generic quote. For a broader look at the tech startup landscape healthtech sits within, see tech startup and enterprise insurance.
upcover Pty Ltd (ABN 17 628 197 437) is a Corporate Authorised Representative (CAR 1299211) of Experience Insurance Services Pty Ltd (ABN 41 657 596 506, AFSL 539078).
It depends on what the product does. Administrative or scheduling software typically needs Tech PI and cyber, similar to standard SaaS. Software that can influence patient care may also need product, medical device or clinical liability cover.
It depends on intended purpose and how the software is supplied, not branding. TGA regulates software intended for diagnosis, monitoring, treatment or similar clinical purposes, subject to specific exclusions and exemptions. Assess this before assuming either way.
Potentially. If a new feature interprets symptoms, suggests a diagnosis, or recommends treatment, it can change your intended purpose and require your TGA status to be reassessed, even if the rest of the product is unchanged.
Often yes, even below the usual $3 million turnover exemption. Health service providers are bound regardless of turnover. Whether your specific business fits that definition, or another trigger applies, is worth checking directly.
Not automatically. Whether bodily injury is covered, excluded or limited depends on the specific policy wording, and some specialist digital health products combine clinical and technology cover. Check this directly with a broker.
Tech PI generally responds to financial loss from a technology or service failure. Clinical liability responds to harm connected to care delivery itself. Healthtech businesses whose software can influence patient care may need both, sometimes in a combined product.
Requirements vary by health service and contract, but may include Tech PI or PI, cyber, product or public liability where relevant, and a Certificate of Currency confirming the insured entity and limits.
Sponsors are generally responsible for assessing medico-legal risk, and trial approval can require indemnity and insurance evidence. Standard Tech PI and cyber cover may not address participant-injury liability, so this is worth checking with a broker rather than assuming.
There's no fixed price. Based on upcover's past healthtech policies, annual premiums have typically ranged from around $1,100 to $5,900, though this varies by business and isn't a quote. Actual cost depends on whether the software is a regulated medical device, whether it can influence patient care, the health information held, and contract requirements from hospitals or enterprise health customers.
This article is general information about TGA regulation, Privacy Act obligations and insurance considerations for healthtech startups. It doesn't constitute legal, regulatory or compliance advice, and TGA and privacy requirements can change. Verify your specific regulatory position with a qualified adviser before relying on this article. Premium figures referenced in this article are based on upcover's past business and historical policy data. They are indicative only, do not constitute a quote, and may not directly relate to your business. Your final premium will be determined based on your specific business's requirements and underwriting factors. All insurance arranged through upcover is subject to the relevant policy wording, PDS, terms and exclusions. upcover Pty Ltd ABN 17 628 197 437 is a Corporate Authorised Representative (CAR 1299211) of Experience Insurance Services Pty Ltd ABN 41 657 596 506, AFSL 539078.
We are digitising commercial insurance and risk management for small, mid-market and technology businesses. We work with a global network of underwriters, challenging legacy brokers and delivering market leading coverage to our customers.